data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc0a7/fc0a78e467b78efb1e81aae374534ca5422fcd83" alt="Capture one pro 8 vs lightroom"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ccde/0ccdea0d15e3535539c83e69e8d55b023087a977" alt="capture one pro 8 vs lightroom capture one pro 8 vs lightroom"
- CAPTURE ONE PRO 8 VS LIGHTROOM SKIN
- CAPTURE ONE PRO 8 VS LIGHTROOM FULL
- CAPTURE ONE PRO 8 VS LIGHTROOM ISO
Chromatic aberration and purple fringing tools that work better on a broader range of files with far less work/twiddling LCC tool which is required for tech cameras, but useful in a variety of niche applications including art reproduction and catalog shooting and automatic dust removal
CAPTURE ONE PRO 8 VS LIGHTROOM FULL
more detailed/flexible controls (assumes/requires more education and a desire for more power/nuance over first-glance-simplicity) like full RGB levels with numerical entry, more specific noise reduction sliders, overlay (great when matching another shot, or fitting a layout, also useful for random applications like matching color in art repro settings or corporate color settings) focus mask (especially powerful for first-round edits and shoots involving tilts/swings)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0302a/0302ad627227f07858aba29586d55b70b5de36fa" alt="capture one pro 8 vs lightroom capture one pro 8 vs lightroom"
for four-corner-and-center analysis in a product/catalog environment)
CAPTURE ONE PRO 8 VS LIGHTROOM ISO
On the other hand if you're shooting fairly high ISO with a dSLR and want the "clean commercial look" LR4/5 does a better job of what I'd call the "sledgehammer" approach of noise reduction if you abhor noise/grain and want no part of it. Noise/Grain/Texture/Microcontrast which looks better if your aesthetic is to allow grain but want that grain to be gaussian, fine, and film like rather than clumpy and digitally blob-like. Better tonality especially in deep shadow detail Better Color (subjective but found consistently enough by myself and a high enough % of customers to say with confidence) especially with strongly saturated colors, purple/pink/red crossovers, skintones, and in steep tonal transitions like strongly side-lit portraits. Off the top of my head (I don't keep a list - things change too frequently): Here is a self-quote from a recent post on made on another forum regarding reasons to select C1 over LR: Though I do try hard to provide accurate advice founded on real world experience I can't be considered entirely objective. Since you're new here I should first point out my bias. The only downside is that C1s Catalogs don`t work as good as Sessions, so if you are accustomed to LRs Catalogs I suggest switching your mindset to Sessions. I suggest you watch their excellent webinars and video tutorials before starting working with C1. Then there is focus mask, the excellent loupe tool and many many more advanced features (layered local adjustements, color wheel. ), fast and easy organisation within a session and best of all you are not tied to a predefined workspace design (like in LR) but can design your workspace in details as deep as it goes. Other advantages: I really like working with sessions, a few neat tricks in tethered mode (overlay, composition mode.
CAPTURE ONE PRO 8 VS LIGHTROOM SKIN
The biggest advantage - rendering of the skin tones, just perfect. I switched from LR to C1 when I got my Leaf Aptus and could not be more satisfied with C1. Leaf Capture is no longer developed (I think 11 is the last version).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc0a7/fc0a78e467b78efb1e81aae374534ca5422fcd83" alt="Capture one pro 8 vs lightroom"